Friday, May 14, 2010

Comprehensive fee increases, part 2

By Benjamin Engle

Union College has three sources of revenue that support the budget: the comprehensive fee, endowment income, and gifts to the Annual Fund. The comprehensive fee is 74% of the budget while the endowment income is 14% and the Annual Fund, which is made up of gifts from alumni, contributes 3%. Bookstore, Dining Services, and other miscellaneous sources make up the remaining 9% of the budget.

At its peak, the endowment contributed 15% to the budget. However, the economic recession has played a major role in the increase in the comprehensive fee because the endowment and Annual Fund cannot contribute as much to the budget as it once did. The endowment dropped approximately $100 million from its high of $400 million in 2008 and the number of gifts to the Annual Fund has also decreased.

Like many other liberal arts schools, Union is currently attempting to determine if there is a fourth source of revenue available to the institution. Recently, Middlebury College in Vermont announced that it is investing $4 million for a 40% share in "Middlebury Interactive Languages," an online language program for students Kindergarten through 12th grade. Middlebury is hoping that the computer software will provide a fourth revenue stream to support the College's liberal arts-style of teaching.

"We wanted to do something about the fact that not enough American students are learning other languages, and it's harder for students if they don't learn language until college," Middlebury President Ronald D. Liebowitz said in an interview with a writer from the New York Times on April 13, 2010. "It is also my belief, and I think our board's belief, that finding potential new sources of revenue is not a bad thing. By doing what we're doing with this venture, we hope to take some stress off our three traditional sources of revenue- fees, endowment and donations."

While Union's administration and Planning and Priorities Committee are planning to determine if there is another way to bring in revenue, they do not want to compromise the reputation of the college.

"We don't want to do something for the sake of money," Blake said. "It has to relate to the school. We have to do things that make sense for Union."

Even though Union is looking outside of the box for new sources of revenue, the college is continuing to keep a close eye on the budget to determine whether cuts can be made.

This process has been ongoing since the 2008-2009 academic year, when each Vice President was asked to determine where they could make a 5% cost reduction to see how the cut would affect the College. While the Vice Presidents didn't make 5% cuts across the board, some departments made more cuts than others.

Moreover, even though the college is not instituting a hiring freeze, departments are undergoing a review process to determine how each can deliver services more efficiently. However, the college would like to undergo "growth by substitution," meaning that when a position opens, the college can opt not to fill every position and use the additional money for new creative projects and initiatives.

However, as Union prepares for future budgets, the institution is mindful of its competitors.

"Union is in an academic arms race," Blake said. "We are a very elite school and have a high ranking and an impressive peer list. We are keeping an eye on what other [schools] are offering since we don't want to be at a competitive disadvantage."

While Union is navigating itself through increasing costs of goods and labor as well as an economic recession, Blake believes that the situation is improving.

"The situation is not dire since we are constantly looking ahead," Blake said. "We are taking actions so problems aren't exacerbated."

Originally published in Union's Concordy on May 13, 2010.

Comprehensive fee increases for 35th consecutive year

By Benjamin Engle

This two-part article was written in response to an email from alum Geoff Pietsch '59. He paid 900 dollars for tuition during his four years at Union and questioned the justification behind consistently rising rates of the college's tuition.

The Union College comprehensive fee will increase in the 2010-2011 fiscal year for the thirty-fifth consecutive year.

Up 3.75% from the current 2009-2010 fiscal year, the comprehensive fee, which includes the cost of tuition, room, board, student activity fee, and Minerva House fee, is scheduled to be $53,329 in 2010-2011. The 3.75% increase is the lowest increase in the comprehensive fee since the 2001-2002 fiscal year.

According to the National Center on Public Policy and Higher Education, college tuition and fees across the country from 1982 to 2007 increased 439% while the median income only rose by 147%. From 1982 to 2007, Union's comprehensive fee increased $17,219, almost a five-fold increase.

While the cost of college is increasing at a greater rate than the rate of inflation, Diane Blake, Vice President for Finance and Administration, believes that college tuition cannot be based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) since institutions of higher education have their market baskets of goods are different. Instead, colleges are held to the Higher Education Price Index (HEPI).

According to Commonfund, the group that calculates the HEPI, "HEPI measures the average relative level in the prices of a fixed market basket of goods and services purchased by colleges and universities through current-fund educational and general expenditures." The HEPI is comprised of faculty, administrative, clerical, and service employees' salaries and benefits as well as miscellaneous services, supplies and materials, and utilities.

Meanwhile, the CPI, which is compiled by the U.S. Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, is a measure of the average change in prices over time in fixed basket of goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living. The CPI is made up of food, clothing, shelter, fuel, and transportation fees, among other services.

According to Blake, Union's comprehensive fee increases yearly despite departmental and administrative cuts since the various costs of labor make up almost half of Union's budget.

"We are a labor-intensive institution," Blake said. "We pride ourselves on our 10:1 faculty ratio. If we didn't maintain that ratio, Union wouldn't be the education you applied for."

Union takes pride in the quality of faculty that it hires. This goal, however, is an expensive one, since most of the faculty hold Ph.Ds or the highest academic certification in their field. Also, Graduate Assistants and Teaching Assistants do not teach classes at Union.

"[Students] come [to Union] because of the small class size, close interaction with professors, and classes taught solely by those with PhDs," Blake said. "We don't want to lay off faculty because we want to maintain our current ratio."

Despite the fact that faculty and staff salaries and benefits make up the greatest percentage of the annual budget, Blake admits that those emoployed by the college are underpaid.

"On average, the faculty [at Union] is not paid as well as those at our peer institutions," Blake said, "but it is part of the Strategic Plan to improve the situation."

The comprehensive fee that students pay continues to increase annually because traditional revenue sources for the college have decreased over the years.

"The full price is not the cost of a Union education," Blake added.

Benjamin Engle's coverage of rising tuition at Union will be continued next week in our 5/13 edition.

Originally published in Union's Concordy on May 6, 2010.